Tag: contemplation

  • Creative Bypassing:  Grist for the Mill

    Creative Bypassing:  Grist for the Mill

    I’d like to make a confession.

    On Sunday mornings, I sit in church internally spinning out a reactive, biting critique of the service, how hollow and performative it is, how the sermons charge us to do justice and love kindness and walk humbly without ever addressing how, feeling mightily superior about the vibrancy of my prayer life and a tad resentful that other folks in the pews don’t recognize this. Valid as my criticisms may be, this inclination to nurse my wounds with “holier than thou” thoughts is, well, shameful. It’s a form of spiritual bypassing, a trap those of us walking transformational paths tend to stumble into. Flamboyantly. Embarrassingly.

    The term “spiritual bypassing” was coined by John Welwood, a Buddhist teacher and psychotherapist, when he noticed clients avoiding painful emotions by seeking refuge in spiritual ideas or practices. Rather than feeling grief that the beloved institution of my faith is faulty and dying, rather than getting angry that the beautiful mystical dimension of Christianity is so misunderstood, rather than experiencing the swelling loneliness of a committed transformational path, I take refuge in superiority. My fantasy keeps me safe, isolated, and stagnant.

    To be completely honest, part of the reason I keep going to church is how humiliating these internal reactions are. I don’t like them. Maybe if for an hour each week I face these weaknesses, I can stop bypassing and finally walk the walk.

    Creative folks have our own version of bypassing. As soon as pen hits the page, writers’ thoughts leap ahead to publication, with its kudos and condemnation. We imagine the inspiration we’ll bestow upon our readers and the benefits our work will impart to society. If we don’t spin out far-flung fantasies of fame, we console ourselves by assuming others will at least validate our worth. By taking refuge in our beloved image of fulfilled creativity, we skillfully avoid whatever hard work presents itself: the effort of validating our own worth; the arduous process of showing up in our creations; the painful need to face our smallness; the exercise of faith to proceed regardless.

    Writing, like spiritual growth, takes time and effort. When we leap over the process to the product, we bypass art. In the meantime, we can be grateful that the process makes us aware of our propensity for bypassing. Once we see it, it can become, as a former therapist often told me, more “grist for the mill.”

    —Elizabeth Jarrett Andrew

    Appreciate these reflections? Move the gift forward with a contribution to the Eye of the Heart’s writing programs. Your generosity helps keep the Gifts of Writing Micro-course and ongoing online community free to everyone. Give here!

    Photo by falco from pixabay

  • Celebration on the Altar of the World

    Celebration on the Altar of the World

    Well, friends, my decades-long obsession with revision has reached a new extreme. I’ve shamelessly messed with another author’s work. Is this even allowed?

    When my mother died, her study group was preparing to read Teilhard’s Divine Milieu. I picked up her beat-up paperback copy just as I began a two-year formation program in contemplative Christianity. One day my teachers used the beginning paragraphs of Teilhard’s Mass on the World to open a period of silent prayer. Soaring language, earthy reverence, our group’s collective yearning, and the potency of my mother’s spiritual legacy washed through me; I couldn’t stop weeping. Never before had liturgy touched me so deeply.

    Teilhard de Chardin was a scientist, paleontologist, philosopher, and Jesuit priest; born in France in 1881, he served as a stretcher-bearer during WWI and over the course of his career taught and conducted research in England, Egypt, China, and the U.S. He participated in the discovery of Peking Man. But at heart he was a mystic, and his sweeping recognition of divine unfolding within evolution was so radical, church authorities in Rome forbade him to teach theology, banned his books, and banished him to China. Teilhard’s vision, that matter is spiritually potent and evolution a progression toward consciousness, is to this day treated by mainstream Christianity with skepticism.

    I think it’s brilliant.

    When Teilhard was serving in the trenches, unable to celebrate a traditional Mass for lack of bread and wine, he instead said “a Mass on all things,” lifting himself up “beyond these symbols, up to the pure majesty of the real itself.” He made the whole earth his altar on which he placed the “labors and sufferings of the world.” Years later, on an expedition on the Yellow River, he again took up the practice and wrote The Mass on the World. Teilhard had the audacity to revise the Catholic Mass—even worse, to reimagine Christ’s body and blood as evolving earth and suffering humanity. No wonder his work was censored. 

    Even so, my experience of Teilhard’s personal Mass was so tremendous, I felt baffled that no one ever used it. So I read it in full—and found it heady, verbose, disorganized, patriarchal, and way too long. What?! No wonder my teachers read only a few paragraphs. That’s when my revision fingers started itching. Could I re-render the liturgy, lending it economy, flow, inclusivity and functionality while preserving Teilhard’s soaring language and incarnational theology? Better yet, could I layer in my own reverence for the divine feminine principle within creation? I imagined myself as a translator, making accessible to contemporary (and often disenfranchised) Christians a dimension of our mystical heritage that too often remains hidden.

    The project has been unlike anything I’ve done before. Rewriting someone else’s prose is an audacious exercise, especially if its author was a brilliant mystic. But I figure Teilhard would approve. We’re both revising the tradition we’ve inherited to more fully praise the life and light infusing creation, here and now, with what we’re been given. Not only that:  By practicing revision, we become active agents of creation’s unfolding. Teilhard would say that’s what we humans were made for.

    – Elizabeth Jarrett Andrew

    PS: You’re invited to experience this Celebration with us at Eye of the Heart Center’s upcoming sunrise event:

  • Writing in the Cloud of Privacy & Unknowing

    Writing in the Cloud of Privacy & Unknowing

    Perhaps because my first big writing project gave me room to articulate my sexual longings, come out bisexual, and figure out the implications for my Christian faith; perhaps because I’m drawn to spiritual and therefore intimate subjects, my first drafts (and often second and third) I tend to write for no one but me.  Of course this blog is an exception; I’m very much thinking of you, dear reader!  The middle grade novel I’m plugging away at is for my daughter and my books on craft are for writers, so I’m well aware of when and how readers influence my solitary time at the writing desk.  Frequently, however, I move from my journal to a project notebook to the computer, preserving what I call my “cloud of privacy and unknowing.”  I think of it as a psychic space where I can inhabit completely the mystery of what’s emerging, without concern for others. 

    With practice the boundaries around this space have strengthened.  I’m more fearless, probing, truthful, experimental.  The pressure to produce has diminished, and my patience for each project’s slow evolution has increased.  Sure, I’m just as committed to the literary art, but now in service of my subject and my heart’s curiosity rather than any reader.  I’ve had fun.  I’m writing better than ever.  I’m producing pieces that are less and less publishable—too risky, too Christian, too interior—but also care less when they don’t make it into readers’ hands.  Some I choose never to send out.

    I borrow the “cloud of unknowing” metaphor from an anonymous 14th century mystic who used it to describe silent prayer.  If you substitute his masculine God language with “audience” or, as I do, a sense of union with the Other, he accurately describes my experience of writing:

    When you first begin, you find only darkness, and as it were a cloud of unknowing.  You don’t know what this means except that in your will you feel a simple steadfast intention reaching out towards God.  Do what you will, this darkness and this cloud remain between you and God, and stop you both from seeing him in the clear light of rational understanding, and from experiencing his loving sweetness in your affection.  Reconcile yourself to wait in this darkness as long as is necessary, but still go on longing after him whom you love.  For if you are to feel him or to see him in this life, it must always be in this cloud, in this darkness.  And if you will work hard at what I tell you, I believe that through God’s mercy you will achieve this very thing.  

    About ten years ago, I was so blown open by a dream and unsettled by what was transpired afterward in prayer that I began an essay.  Narrative essays, with their cadence and thrust, their capacious generosity, I knew could usher me into the fiery core of my questions.  For years I shared this project with no one, not even my trusty writing group.  It was too secret, too embarrassing, too Christian.  When I realized I was withholding this dimension of my prayer life from my spiritual director (because the process itself was as much prayer as the meditation I was describing), I let him read it.  Four years ago I finished.  At 8000 words, with quotes from the Bible and theologians and my contemplative teachers, I assumed it was unpublishable and tucked it away.  Other than my spiritual director, no one laid eyes on it.

    In the intervening years I’ve grown into the essay’s insights.  The boldness gleaned in that cloud of privacy has spilled into my teaching, my friendships.  What once felt embarrassing is now a truth I share frequently.  So when I saw Orison Press’s chapbook contest, I submitted the essay.

    And won.  Now I’m reeling with wonder that anyone, friends and strangers, might join me between the stapled pages inside my sweet cloud.  It’s dark there and aches for that which we most love.  Time is so slow or fast we can’t sense its passage.  We know nothing, feel nothing, are struck dumb, and nonetheless, unfathomably, are bathed in mercy.  What else can I do but bow down in gratitude?

    – Elizabeth Jarrett Andrew

    PS: Read more about this award & see upcoming offerings and events here!

    Photo by Yoann Boyer on Unsplash

  • Faith and the “Poopy Growth Mindset”

    Ask what I’m learning in the Living School and I’ll blather incoherently, enthusiastically, and at great length about the Christian mystical tradition, the significance of contemplation, and a complete overhaul of my faith. I was doing just that at Easter dinner a few weeks ago. My father-in-law asked, and all eleven relatives at the table stared at me blankly while I answered. Afterward, my brother-in-law quipped, “You should say you’re studying an ancient wisdom tradition. Calling it ‘Christian’ just throws everybody off.” Well, yes. (more…)

  • God as Being, Being as God

    A few years ago, I set off on a journey to the heart of Christian contemplation, both in practice and with studies. I began doing Centering Prayer, a form of meditation rooted in monasticism and the teachings of the mystics, and reading works from the mystical margins of Christian tradition—St. John of the Cross, Meister Eckhart, Theresa of Avila, Bonaventure, the Patristic fathers—and sharing all this with an international contemplative community. It’s been thrilling. The work transforms me from the inside out, and will have a profound on my writing, teaching, and living for years to come.

    Because I love and trust language so much, the hardest part about these past years has been my inability to talk about what I’m learning. I put down a book or return from a symposium feeling like my internal furniture has been rearranged, but I can’t say how, or why, or what. I’m a blubbering fool. (more…)

  • Writing as Listening

    On a good morning of writing, the words leave my head entirely and reside in my fingers. Writing is a quiet business. Once I tried to explain this to a spiritual director—the way my heart stills and the room pulses with silence—but she didn’t believe me. How can you work with words and be quiet at the same time? Surely it’s impossible. (more…)

  • Entering Shadowland

    pokahoesunset16-04Cancer does this: Shake you out of the status quo and drop you into a different realm, one where your everyday priorities are rearranged and suddenly small talk, the cleanliness of the house, even your job ambitions seem ridiculous. Instead you give yourself over to what really matters: Being present to one another. Doing everything possible to tend to health and well-being. Emily and I call this place of intensity Cancerland. Life-threatening illness does a marvelous job of helping you reprioritize.

    But so do other things, like the death of a loved one or losing a home or experiencing trauma. The last time our country did a collective gasp and had to reprioritize was 9/11. The recent election shocked some of us into a new way of seeing the world. Our national shadows—the parts of us that fear the Other, that wants to eradicate whatever seems to threaten our wellbeing—are now out in the open. They’ve been there all along, as people of color and immigrants and trans folks have been trying to tell us. But now we’re all plunged into a new reality: Shadowland, a country where democratic processes are scorned and fear has taken the reigns. (more…)

  • Merton’s Adam

    IMG_1786God makes Adam and Eve, places them in the garden, and tells them not to eat from the tree of knowledge. They screw up. God kicks them out to spend their lives toiling the fields and suffering in childbirth. To this day we bear Adam’s curse—our inclination toward evil.

    Or at least that’s the story most of us know, and rebel against accordingly. At the Re-Imagining, the feminist theological revival that happened in the nineties, women proudly chomped on apples as a symbol of their willful embrace of knowledge. Liberal Christians reject the doctrine of original sin, replacing it with Matthew Fox’s “original blessing.” All of us Christians struggle to overcome millennia of unnecessary shame about human nakedness. There’s even a movement to reinstate the good reputation of snakes. (more…)

  • Message from the Page: “Would you please pay attention?!”

    Graph PaperYour primary job as an artist is to seduce other people into paying attention. You are not creating anything new; you are re-creating what already exists so that people will recognize it and deal with it. You describe activities and name states of being so that the people who witness your work will have a fuller vocabulary for their own life. You help people see what has been in front of them all along. You help them remember what has been buried so deep that they couldn’t find it on their own. You enable them to see themselves a little more clearly.  –Vintia Hampton Wright, The Soul Tells a Story

    During 2016 I arrived at surprising clarity about my spiritual path: I’m a contemplative, albeit one who walks her daughter to school in the morning, struggles with a perpetually cluttered house, and writes as my primary practice. To contemplate is to stand in the temple. The world with its dirty socks and hidden cruelties and winter sunrises is my temple. I stand in it when I pay attention. (more…)